For me, this new 24-105 will be too much extra size, weight, and price over the already excellent 24-105 F4. Yes, my RF 24-105 f4 is an outstanding lens. It's my go-to lens for event photography. The Canon RF 24-105mm F4 L IS USM zooms a bit further than the 24-70mm F2.8, and while it While they measure 3.3 inches wide, the 24-70mm is 0.7 inches longer than the 24-105mm. In terms of weight, the 24-70mm is 0.6 mm heavier than the other one. The slight difference in length and weight is due to the number of aperture blades. Because: size and weight. It looks to be too big and too heavy for my idea of its best use role. The existing lenses in this segment are the 24-105 f4.0, the 24-70 f/2.8 and the 28-70 f/2.0, all very good performing lenses. The first two are also fairly compact and light, while the 3rd isn't, but has a truly rare, for any zoom, really wide The Canon RF 24-105mm f4 L IS USM has some incredible image stabilization that I truly can't fault at all. It's a great lens in many ways. Weight. Φ3.29 x 4.22 in., approx. 1.54 lbs. / Φ83.5 Canon RF 24-70 f/2.8 vs RF 28-70 f/2 (AKA: The Beast) If you are into photography and gear, and especially if you are a big Canon fan (like me). You may have been loosing your mind ever so slightly over Canon’s announcement of their new, professional mirrorless camera bodies. 3 days ago · RF lenses, which we focus on in this guide, are designed for the full-frame cameras in Canon's R system range: the EOS R8, R6 (and R6 Mark II), R5, and R3. RF-S lenses are designed with APS-C cameras (the R100, R50, R10, and R7) in mind. RF lenses have an image circle that covers a full-frame sensor, while the image circle in RF-S lenses covers The Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8 L IS USM is the lens that pros and serious shutterbugs will want for their full-frame camera. Weight: 2 lb Filter Thread: 82 mm the RF 24-105mm F4-7.1 is a better .

canon rf 24 105 f4 weight